Legal Alerts Jul 07, 2014

Ruling That Curtails Public Agencies’ Abilities to Get Order Protecting Project Planning Inspections

Supreme Court Decides to Review Lower Court Case

Ruling That Curtails Public Agencies’ Abilities to Get Order Protecting Project Planning Inspections

An appellate court ruling that essentially curtailed the ability of public agencies to obtain a court order to conduct project planning inspections was decertified by a grant of review by the California Supreme Court. In Property Reserve. Inc. v. Superior Court of San Joaquin County,the State of California petitioned for an order for entry to conduct two general categories of pre-condemnation activities: geological and environmental inspections. The Third District Court of Appeal’s March 2014 ruling found that the pre-condemnation entry statutes (Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.010 et seq.) violate the taking provisions of article 1, section 19 of the California Constitution.

The Court’s decision last week to grant review immediately decertifies the appellate court’s ruling. Public agencies are free to again seek court orders for project planning inspections. Although the arguments relied on by the property owners remain available and the fact that the constitutionality of the statutes are under review can be pointed out, the appellate court’s ruling is no longer legal precedence for denying an order under the entry statutes.

The Court’s review will focus on three issues:

  1. Do geological inspections constitute a taking?
  2. Do environmental inspections constitute a taking?
  3. If so, do the precondemnation entry statutes provide a constitutionally valid eminent domain proceeding for the taking?

The answer to these three questions will provide public agencies and property owners with either a clear path forward for project planning inspections, or turn project planning upside down until the Legislature fashions a resolution.

Please feel free to share this Legal Alert or subscribe by clicking here. Follow us on Twitter @bbklaw.

Disclaimer: BB&K legal alerts are not intended as legal advice. Additional facts or future developments may affect subjects contained herein. Seek the advice of an attorney before acting or relying upon any information in this communiqué.

Continue Reading