Toolbar

e-Bulletin: EPA Issues Final Rule on Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries into Previous Ownership and Uses of Property as Required under CERCLA


December 4, 2006

January 1, 2006

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued its final rule on federal standards and practices for conducting all appropriate inquires (AAI) as required under section 101(35)(B)(ii) and (iii) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). The AAI standard clarifies the requirements necessary to establish the innocent landowner, bona fide prospective purchaser (BFPP), and contiguous property defenses. Persons claiming these liability protections must conduct AAI into prior ownership and uses of a property prior to or on the date he or she acquires the property. The purpose of AAI is to identify releases and threatened releases of hazardous substances that cause or threaten to cause the incurrence of response costs. The final rule took effect on November 1, 2006 and replaces interim standards established by Congress in 2002 under the Brownfields Amendments to CERCLA.

In addition, state, local, and tribal governments receiving federal brownfields grants awarded under CERCA section 104 (k)(2)(B) to conduct site characterizations and assessments must conduct such activities in accordance with standards and practices for AAI.

Background

Persons may be held strictly liable for cleaning up hazardous substances at properties that they either currently own or operate or owned operated at the time of disposal under CERCLA. In other words, a potentially responsible party (PRP) may be liable for environmental contamination based solely on property ownership and irrespective of his or her fault or negligence.

In 1986 the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (“SARA”) amended CERCLA by creating an “innocent landowner” defense to CERCLA liability. CERCLA section 101(35)(B) provided a defense to CERCLA liability for persons who “did not know and had no reason to know” prior to purchasing a property that a hazardous substance released or threatened to be released was disposed of on, in, or at the property. To claim the innocent landowner defense, such persons had to have conducted AAI into the previous ownership and uses of the property consistent with good commercial or customary standards and practices.

In 2002 the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act, known as the Brownfields Amendments to CERCLA, was enacted. The Brownfields Amendments added potential liability protections for BFPPs and contiguous property owners who also must show they conducted AAI to assert the defenses. In addition, BFPPs and contiguous property owners must show that they are not potentially liable or affiliated with any other person that is potentially liable for response costs at the property. A BFPP must have acquired a property subsequent to any disposal activities involving hazardous substances at the property. A contiguous property owner must show that he did not cause, contribute, or consent to any release or threatened release of hazardous substances. The contiguous property owner defense essentially protects persons who are victims of pollution caused by their neighbors actions.

Congress established interim AAI standards as part of the Brownfields Amendments, which were effective January 11, 2002. For properties purchased after May 31, 1997, the interim standards include the procedures of the ASTM Standard E1527-97 (“Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process”). Persons who purchased properties prior to May 31, 1997 and wish to establish the innocent landowner or continuous property owner defenses must have conducted AAI into the previous ownership and uses of the property in accordance with generally accepted good commercial and customary standards and practices.

The current interim standard for AAI may not apply to property acquired by a non-governmental entity or non-commercial entity for residential or other similar uses. For those cases, the Brownfields Amendments establish that a “facility inspection and title search that reveal no basis for further investigation shall be considered to satisfy the requirements’ for AAI. These properties are not within the scope of the EPA’s final rule on AAI.

Final All Appropriate Inquiries Rule

EPA’s final AAI rule amends Title 40, Chapter I, part 312 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The primary objective of AAI is to identify conditions indicative of releases and threatened releases of hazardous substances on, at, in, or to the subject property. For recipients of Brownfields grants, the objective may also include petroleum and petroleum products, pollutants, contaminants, and controlled substances.

The final AAI standards continue certain obligations, including: complying with land use restrictions and not impeding the effectiveness or integrity of institutional controls; taking “reasonable steps” with respect to hazardous substances affecting a landowner’s property to prevent releases; providing cooperation, assistance and access to EPA, a state, or other party conducting response actions or natural resource restoration at the property; complying with CERCLA information requests and administrative subpoenas; and providing legally required notices.

Many of the AAI activities must be conducted by or under the supervision or responsible charge of, an individual who qualifies as an “environmental professional.” The final rule’s definition of an environmental professional differs from the ASTM E1527-00 standard because it only concerns the qualifications of the individual supervising the conduct of AAI; other individuals without proper qualifications may still take part in AAI as long as they are supervised by a person who satisfies the requirements.

Unlike the ASTM E1527-00 standard, the final rule for AAI requires specific certification or licensing, educational, and experience requirements for an environmental professional. In the final rule, an environmental professional is defined as someone who possesses sufficient education, training, and experience necessary to exercise professional judgment to develop opinions and conclusions regarding conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances on, at, in, or to a property. An environmental professional must have a state or tribal issued certification or license and three years of relevant full-time work experience; a baccalaureate degree or higher in science or engineering and five years of relevant full-time work experience; or ten years of relevant full-time work experience.

The inquiries that must be conducted by an environmental professional under the final rule include:

  • Interviews with past and present owners, operators, and occupants to gather information regarding potential contamination at the subject property;
  • Reviews of historical sources of information (e.g., chain of title document, land use records, and aerial photographs);
  • Reviews of federal, state, tribal, and local government records (e.g., site investigation reports; regulatory permits issued for waste management activities; EPA's CERCLA Information System (CERCLIS) containing sites assessed by EPA);
  • Visual inspections of the facility and adjoining properties;
  • Degree of obviousness of the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property and the ability to detect the contamination (after assessing the information collected during AAI in totality).

    Prospective landowners (or grantees), instead of environmental professionals, may conduct the following mandatory activities:

  • Searches for environmental cleanup liens against the subject property;
  • Assessment of any specialized knowledge or experience of the prospective landowners (or grantees);
  • Assessment of the relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the property if the property was not contaminated; and
  • Commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information that is generally known to the public within the community where the property is located.

    Prospective landowners are not required, as a matter of law, to pass this information along to the environmental professionals conducting AAI but are advised to do so to avoid “data gaps” within the AAI analysis.

    AAI must be conducted within one year prior to the prospective landowner acquiring the property. The date of acquisition is the date the landowner obtains title to the property. Certain AAI requirements must be updated within 180 days of acquisition (e.g., interviews, lien searches, and government records reviews).

    Implications of the Final All Appropriate Inquiries Rule

    The final AAI rule is not significantly different from the interim standard in that it encompasses all of the main activities previously performed as part of environmental due diligence such as records review and interviews. The final rule extends the scope of a few of the environmental due diligence activities and requires the documentation of significant data gaps. For example, the final rule makes interviewing the subject property’s current owners or occupants mandatory, unlike the former standard, and includes standards for interviewing past owners and occupants of the subject property to meet the objectives of AAI.

    The final AAI does not, however, specifically address non-CERCLA federal claims, potential liability under state law, petroleum contamination, asbestos, mold, wetlands, or land use.


    For more details on this ruling or its implications on your project, contact an attorney with BB&K's Environmental Law & Natural Resources Practice Group.

    Disclaimer: BB&K eBulletins are not intended as legal advice. Additional facts or future developments may affect subjects contained herein. Seek the advice of an attorney before acting or relying upon any information in this communiqué. ©2006 Best Best & Krieger LLP

  • Related Practices