skip to content

Binding Arbitration Can Be Made More Appealing

BB&K In The News

BB&K Attorney Victor Wolf Looks at the Upside of Resolving Issues Outside of Court

JUNE 19, 2012
The Press-Enterprise

By Victor L. Wolf

In the past few decades, arbitration has become an accepted and widely used alternative to traditional litigation.

For businesses, arbitration generally enters into the picture in construction, real estate, commercial or employment contracts where the parties agree ahead of time to seek arbitration instead of litigation should a dispute occur. On other occasions, even when arbitration is not required under contract, parties may contemplate referring an existing legal dispute to binding arbitration instead of going to court.

The involved parties, rather than having their dispute decided by a judge or jury, refer the case to an arbitrator, a neutral third party who hears evidence and renders a decision. Like a judge, the arbitrator hears opening arguments, closing statements and testimony, but it’s usually behind closed doors in a conference room where everyone is sitting down. The arbitrator makes a written decision that is typically binding.

There are a number of potential advantages to drafting contracts that require disputes to be resolved through arbitration rather than litigation:

Click here to read the entire article on The Press-Enterprise website.


Related Practice

Related Locations


Send this page